Some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention, while others believe that it is the responsibility of the individual to protect themselves. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Answer :
It is undoubtedly true that nowadays, the crime rate is increasing vulnerably all over the world. A number of people believe that it is catalyst of addiction towards liquor. In addition, the consumption of alcohol affects the decision making power of that brain. However, I quibble from the above statements and propound that a liquor ban might reduce the crime rate for some time.
TO begin with, banning alcohol isn't an appropriate way to prevent crime. If a person is addicted then he/she will try to get it at any cost without any consideration of the ban. For instance, the selling and purchase of drugs and alcohol are banned in most countries, but people do have access to them because they are sold illegally. Instead of a decrease in the crime rate, it might result in an increase because of trafficking and illegal selling and purchase.
To control the crime rate, efforts are needed from the government and parents. Firstly, parents need to ensure that they guide their children through the harms of booze on the health and the society. Additionally, they should teach their children, when they reach adulthood about the importance of having hard drinks responsibly if they want to drink. From the government, more and more awareness should be created about the ill-effects of liquor. The administration should establish rehabilitation and support centers. This step will help people who want to quit drinking habits. In such centers, He/She can meet other similar people and they can inspire each other for quitting.
In recapitulation, the excessive consumption of alcohol makes people forget the difference between right and wrong, which indeed increases lawlessness. I think that banning alcohol isn't an effective solution. On the other hand, several other measures such as spreading awareness about booze among the present and future generations could be proven to be more impactful.